Hosting and bandwidth provided by WebCentrix.net.


Members Home arrow Forums

The forums are sponsored by PowerMax -- which sells new and used Macs & iPods *free of sales tax* -- and Other World Computing -- which sells quality Mac memory, drives, & other upgrades.

EveryMac.com Forum  


Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classic? - 2007/09/10 02:54 As expected, Apple has introduced a complete line of new iPods. Are you thrilled that the iPod touch offers the iPhone 'experience' without a phone or the burden of a contract or do you think it lacks adequate storage and is limited unnecessarily by software? Do you like the new video-capable iPod nano design or did you prefer the 'slimmer' iPod nano more? Do you like that the iPod classic can hold as many as 40,000 songs or do you think that larger hard drive-equipped iPods should be discontinued in favor of an all flash-based lineup? Why or why not?
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classic? - 2007/09/10 10:13 the touch ipod is awesomes exactly what i wanted in the iphone. as soon as it gets hacked to run some games i will finally upgrade from my old mini. gotta get it on my xmas list. lol.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classic? - 2007/09/10 11:06 Yay! The iPod touch is what I wanted! More storeage would be nice though.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classic? - 2007/09/10 15:24 I still have my 1st gen iPod: 5 GB hard drive, scroll wheel that actually turns, no dock only Firewire. . . still running on the original battery. I still take it with me every day when I walk, and it still works well at what it was designed to do, at playing music!

However. . .

I am getting a new 80 GB iPod Classic. The other models are nice, but the Classic seems to best meet the original promise of the iPod: your music collection in your pocket. My whole music collection is about 36 GB, so it'll fit easily with room to grow. It's half the thickness of my 1st gen iPod, costs $150 less, runs much longer on a charge, and it has the dock connector which will interface with my new car stereo. What's not to love?

The "touch" is very cool, but to me it's not really an iPod as such. It's a new kind of device, and it's making a new promise that will appeal to different people.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classi - 2007/09/10 17:58 When the touchPod gets to at least 32 GB, I'll buy. 16's just not enough.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.
Re:Discussion Q&A - Opinion Re: iPod touch, classi - 2007/12/05 14:24 i went for the classic 80g after finding the 2gb of my 1st gen nano too restrictive (despite spending my youth with a walkman that could fit 2 albums on one cassette - you'd think that i'd be grateful eh?).

the touch had too little storage. i still think the 1st gen ipod is the most elegant ipod ever made. never has my jaw dropped so far as when i saw one for the first time.
  | | The administrator has disabled public write access.



EveryMac.com is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind whatsoever. EveryMac.com, and the author thereof, shall not be held responsible or liable, under any circumstances, for any damages resulting from the use or inability to use the information within. For complete disclaimer and copyright information please read and understand the Terms of Use and the Privacy Policy before using EveryMac.com. Use of any content or images without expressed permission is not allowed, although links to any page are welcomed and appreciated.